An Inaccurate Review of The Fall of the House of Usher Essay -- Fall H

An Inaccurate Review of The Fall of the House of take David A. carpenter, in the form of an render, addresses Edgar Allan Poes short story The Fall of the House of Usher by interpreting themes, meanings, style, and technique within the story. His essay review contains galore(postnominal) quotes and direct references to both Poe and The Fall of the House of Usher however, carpenters analysis proves itself to be inaccurate. work repeatedly writes statements of which he claims argon true, exclusively then argues contrary points. His use of evidence is an extension of his self-negating arguments. Based on the inescapable presence of contradictions and evidence that does not support his opinion, Carpenters essay is an inaccurate review of The Fall of the House of Usher. In his essay, Carpenter writes contradictory statements and expounds upon them in the form of illogical examples and rationale. Within the first destine of the Themes and Meanings section, Carpenter claims The Fall of the House of Usher is not a didactical story, but then follows to say that Poe communicates a definite moral essence (Carpenter 1986). Clearly, the author of the article does not understand what qualifies a literary mesh to be didacticone that contains issues of theology. He also states that the morality represent in Poes short story is an operative universal morality that is ultimately as inescapable as the hereditary forces which determine a persons life (Carpenter 1986). Carpenters attempt to get through his idea of the morality fails when he relates it to hereditary forces, which, in this modern age, consent little impact on determining ones life, and are certainly not inescapable. His logic is presumed an... ... logical events, such as Madeline escaping the casket she was nailed inside of, despite Carpenters previous statements that the story, because of the effect created by the writer, was successful and would not, in general, l eave a reader questioning legitimacy. Overall, Carpenters article leaves much to be desired. At first glance, sentences are confusing and ideas are hazy. As an author, Carpenter is not convincing of his essays general arguments because his statements are assumptions and are not backed up by clear evidence. Contradictions in both his arguments and elaboration reveal Carpenters essay addressing The Fall of the House of Usher to be outlawed and inaccurate.Works CitedCarpenter, David A. Essay review. MagillOnLiterature Database series online 1986 9240000421. Accessed 2002 November 4.2350Marlow 12.37- 1 -