What Is The Expression Theory Of Art Essay -- essays research papers

Art has evolved and regenerated itself some(prenominal) times during our human existence. These differences are defined through changes in styles downstairs various theories. During the nineteenth and early twentieth century, a style know as Expressionism became popular. During this movement the prowessists were trying to use their dodgeistic productionwork as a tool of behaveion toward life. It was mainly dominant in the nonrepresentational arts, such(prenominal) as abstract visual arts and music. It also was probably wiz of the roughly difficult movements to understand because the whole point of the piece identify within the artificer. Not only was it a movement, it defined the act of art as a whole. From the starting line of time, each work of art, excluding replicas, show a way of evinceing ones self. E truly artist puts a piece of his or herself into their artwork. Who real is to determine what that work of art was meant to express? One major power ask, "Sinc e most artwork is used as a way for an artist to express him or herself, what makes this expression period anything special?" On the general aim "Expressionistic art, whether literature, painting, music, or cinema, often involves intense psychic disturbance and torment in the perspective adopted by the artwork." "It is remote from the objective or realistic portrayals of the world, as well as from the happier emotions." To bring a more(prenominal) defined meaning to the overall theory of expressionism, two philosophers play a large role. The first notarized expressionistic philosopher was the Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy who was followed by his transcript R.G. Collingwood a twentieth-century English philosopher. Together they hold the two best know expositions of the expression theory.What make these two analyzers important is not what they agreed on, solely rather on how they contrasted. They both conclude that during the expression theory, the main busines s organisation was to express emotion. The one question that draws the two apart is "What does it mean to express an emotion?" They attempt to conclude this question, by providing the answers to a few others. What the constitution of art is? Why we make and appreciate art? Why the arts are so semiprecious?The best way to go just about describing their thoughts is to state one of the calculateers discoveries followed by a thorough investigation of the seconds, beginning with Leo Tolstoy. He begins his arg... ...correspondent real life events. "If the music does not suggest a real emotional response in a listener, tally to this school of thought, this response should be considered inappropriate."No matter whose view you baffle they all have their faults. Making a theory on art is not the same as making a theory in science. With science you have guidelines that can be proven. There are very few guidelines in art that can be backed up by fact. The ideal of defini ng a theory in art is based on emotions as well. Both Tolstoy and Collingwood are using their emotions in order to judge other emotions. If I were forced to pick a philosopher to side with, I would probably lean toward Collingwood, since he come outs more sector for variety. He places more of the wealth of the emotional art within the artist themselves rather than a third party. If it were totally up to me I would leave the decision on whether a work is good or not between the artist and whomever was viewing it at that time. What I might think as a good piece of work and what might stir emotions in me might not do the same for another who might consider themselves experts, but does that really make my opinion less valuable?