Mobile Phone Use: Assess The Risks Compared With The Benefits Of Mobile Phone Use Particularly In Relation To Young People

Mobile telephonys, the 21st century way of communicating, be they a great thing that works wonders and revolutionize massess lives? Or argon the risks to high a price to pay? I am liberation to investigate the risks of using energetic telephone sets. Around 1/4 (6 million) of brisk phone social functionrs ar under the age of 18 and the number of early users is expected to rise with the total numbers of users is meant to rise to 1.2 billion by 2005 with the fastest growth market as the 9-10 social class olds. Consequently the questions be children more at risk than former(a)s and what are the risks need to be asked and answered. first wellness. The area of the mind-set and its reaction to radiation is very vague and scientists are not 100% sure ab expose anything. There grant been no specific experiments carried out by scientists and in that respect is a big disruption in our scientific knowledge in this area, but it has been shown that restless phone use does pre tend superstar activity and experts con gradientr children to more insecure in that respect are some(prenominal) reasons for this one of these is that children are not amply developed and their skulls are thinner and so it is easier for the radiation waves to penetrate the skull whereas a replete(p)y grown person will come a thicker skull and so is less at risk, although it has been proven through research that use of mobile phones speeds up an individuals reactions.Research has been done on 420 000 phone users to find out whether they have a link with give the axecer, no link was found. However, the incidence of brain cancer has increased 25% since 1973, according to the National Cancer Institute. distributively year, 185,000 Americans will be diagnosed with a primary or metastatic brain tumour, according to the National Brain Tumour Foundation. Also, in another Swedish study a correlation was found between brain tumours and mobile phone use, regardless of which side of th e head it is used. So all in all, though the current balance of evidence does not show health problems caused by mobile phones, it does show that mobile phone use does see brain activity and this is not a problem the mobile phone manufacturers can ignore. some other aspect is base stations (masts.) Should we be sorry about these as well? It is said that the closer the phone is to a mast the safer they are. This is because they automati vocaly reduce the out commit by about 1000th of the full power. Therefore, the more people who use the mobile phones the more masts the companies will put up the safer it will be to use the mobile phones. The heating affect from base stations is 5000x smaller than from the mobile phone itself. On the other hand, however, the environmental impact of masts might affect peoples sense of well-being and there is a perceived risk from them to health, so there is particular tinct when placed near schools.The depreciate is another step up there is unimp eachably two sides to this argument. One side of the argument is that the mobile is an unnecessary expense for parents to cope with, and that the youngsters take advantage of their parents. On the other hand, if there is a problem with this, then the parents can either assert look use it sparingly, or refuse to pay the bills and buy them a pay and go phone where it is the childs problem if they have no money on their phones and they can pay for their own to-up vouchers. One advantage is that it frees up the landline national for the parents, as a parent Anne Kent explains at first I estimation it was unnecessary but soon changed my mind when I saw it freed up our phone at home, and has the further advantage of reducing landline bills as a consequence. Clearly this problem can be easily puzzle out it just needs a bit of common sense. This leads us onto the nigh area, childrens safety (in relation to curse) and responsible use.One of the main advantages to young people having m obiles is that it gives their parents peace of mind so there are less in a bad way(p) parents especially those in remote areas, As Mrs Watson of Northumberland explains we felt it was important for Sian to have a mobile phone because living in the country we are very isolated. Both parent and child are able to feeling more secure only being a telephone call away from each other. On the other hand how secure is a child with the rising crime statistics.Crime is another big issue that should be considered carefully. Mobile phone robberies make up 36% of Londons crime and 41% in Birmingham also. It has been said by the metropolitan police that mug for mobile phones has increased by 53% in the last year with 11-16 years olds most at risk. 12% of young teenagers have had a phone stolen at least once, and most of this theft is carried out by black males in gangs. It is said by many that they only have phones to show off. So are you prepared to take the risk?The nett issue is whether edu cation is adversely affected. On the one hand many schools say this is not a problem in most cases because there are strict no phone rules. On the other hand, some say that mobiles have become the teachers pest with students using mobiles to text during lesson and so on. Another side to this is the language used in text messages for example cul8r (see you later) could this destroy the slope language?My verdict is that we cannot simply ban phones. It would be like penalise the use of cars just because there is a risk of injury or damage. Its not right to take todays generations way of communicating away from them. Another reason is that if they were banned or even just made illegal for children to have them, there would hundreds of thousands of jobs lost because the mobile phone industry is growing daily. We dont take the dummy from the baby or the car from the driver, so wherefore the phone from the teenager. However, in the light of the evidence it would be equally anomalous t o use them wilfully. So sensible precautions should ensure safe use.